Image via PixabayEver remarked that a puppy looked “cute enough to eat?” You’re not alone — one in four say they’d name an animal after a food, according to new research.
A recent study asked 2,005 people to describe the thought process they use when choosing names for their animal companions.
In addition to the 28% of respondents who’ve given their pets delicious-sounding monikers like “Meatball” or “Biscuit,” 36% give their four-legged friends “human” names — think “Jessica” or “Kevin.”
That’s compared to 32% who prefer pet names that stick to traditional names, like Fido or Fluffy.
Conducted by OnePoll on behalf of PupBox, the survey also asked what themes people use when naming multiple pets in a household.
The most popular choices were pop culture icons and fictional characters (both 37%), followed by historical figures (33%).
For individual pet names, 38% said they would use an interesting name of an acquaintance for inspiration, while a similar percentage would get their inspiration from movies, TV shows, books and music.
More than six in 10 admitted to judging other people for what they’ve named their pets.
Unusual names can help a pet stand out, for better or worse, as 68% say they are more likely to remember a name, human or animal, if it is unique or out of the ordinary.
With so many factors to consider, it’s no wonder that 85% of pet parents have given their pet at least one nickname.
And almost two-thirds of those claim they use their pet’s nickname so often that they’ve forgotten its actual name.
When it comes to training, 55% of respondents said it took longer than two weeks for them to teach their pet its name.
That’s perhaps why almost six in 10 believe teaching an animal its name is one of the hardest parts of getting a new pet, and another 58% expressed concern about how to train their new companion.
